Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:12
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
How can I fall asleep fast at night?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What does it feel like wearing tights?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Molestiae quas aut aut quisquam eum aut.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban - Bloomberg
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
What great song was "ruined" once you really listened to the lyrics?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
‘Resident Evil: Requiem’ Will Refocus On the Series’ Past - Gizmodo